Minggu, 17 April 2016

sejarah kali jodoh jakarta

Prostitution as a social problem, it is often seen as a profession that is unlawful because its effects can be devastating to the credibility of a household. However, on the other hand should be accepted as the existence of a social reality when referring to the history of human civilization, where Kalijodo on one side as well as a means of social-economic needs of the majority of society.

So in view of the phenomenon became unsurprisingly Kalijodo as a brothel 'third-class' in Jakarta has much to learn from studying the scientists social. One is through the research I Ketut Suardana. He conducted research in Kalijodo for the purposes of writing his thesis in 2000.
In the study Suardana find the facts when in illegal prostitution complex Kalijodo that there is a pattern of relationships social order. The regularity as a form of social relationship between fellow prostitutes, pimps, and local residents. The pattern of the triangular relationship is based on patterns of patron-client relationships. With this type of patron: landowners, owners of capital, Chairman of RW, and other patrons.
"Each patron plays in the lives of prostitutes in the slums Kalijodo wild," he wrote, was quoted on Sunday (21/2).
In fact, the phenomenon of prostitution Kalijodo be functional in the social system of local communities highly dependent citizens in meeting their needs. Kalijodo located in RT 001, RT 003, RT 004, RT 005 and RT 006 at RW 05 Penjaringan Slaughter Village which is illegal slums.
Add caption
Ketut write as slums, Kalijodo has a history that embodies the current conditions of local communities. Location prostitution Kalijodo begins with the presence of the Chinese people to do traditional "Cengbeng" since the 1950s. This tradition of inviting attraction to visit and while fishing in the Flood Canal where the water is clean and clear once used by the community to find a mate.

"In the development of the 1950's through 1991's, this location has been established homes and home residence or homestead for prostitutes," he wrote again.
Kalijodo Controlled Group Two Thugs
In addition to a pattern of patron-client relations, and community groups, which runs Kalijodo Which? The answer, there are no categories of society. This power sharing is more grounded by garus group of local origin.
Large communities ruler or thugs in Kalijodo are citizens of ethnic Mandar, Makassar, and a community of citizens from Serang. This phenomenon revealed by the Director General of Criminal Investigation Jakarta Police Commissioner Krishna Murti in his book, 'Geger Kalijodo'.
According to Krishna, this is the third group which much of the vacant lands along the river, as a place of gambling. The land was under their control by placing the thugs to keep the land they peg.
"On the ground that they were setting up stalls gambling. Penguasan shanties gambling and gambling games themselves are then subsequently create competition between the more viscous. "He wrote was quoted on Sunday (21/2).
Krishna said each group enlarge the number of members on the basis of kinship systems. Group to add members from Makassar Makassar, Mandar group was as well. It relates to the increase in unemployment due to the financial crisis.

Based on the social environment, which is polarized in such a way, he added, each case is always triggered by a brawl between residents of persecution cases. That's why the police give special attention to cases 170 and 351. The mention of the case was based on article in the Code of Penal (Penal Code).
Article 170 is the Article 351 acts of beatings and mistreatment causing serious injury or mild to die. Usually the case will quickly spread and involve the masses in large numbers, if the persecution carried out by two groups of gang or a different ethnic group. "Obviously.

Krishna explained after the conflict, would be followed peacemaking. In the peace declaration, each group was asked to order their subordinates. So that was never a peace clause asking, if there is one member of the group A throwing a tantrum in place B, the obligation to return the group B to the group and the task group leaders to punish their subordinates who like throwing a tantrum.

"But the model is not an effective punishment, often appearing discontent, especially when there is a group of men who make trouble, was not punished by the chairman of the group, '' he said.

Tidak ada komentar:

Posting Komentar